Legal Opinion

Winniczek, Hilary M. v. Nagelberg, Sheldon

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 8, 2005No. 04-2106Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-2106 HILARY MAREK WINNICZEK and DANUTA WINNICZEK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHELDON B. NAGELBERG, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Objection to Bill of Costs ____________ SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 1, 2005—DECIDED MARCH 8, 2005 ____________ Before BAUER, POSNER, and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. After we reversed the judgment,

394 F.3d 505

(7th Cir. 2005), the appellants submitted a bill of costs in the amount of $827. The appellee objects to certain items. One of his objections presents a novel question; hence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Robert Cengr v. Fusibond Piping Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Cheryle A. Collins and Heywood Fuller T. v. Kay GormanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API