Legal Opinion

MacKeen v. Town of Canton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 11, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiffs, who are registered voters in the town of Canton, seek a determination that an amendment of the town’s zoning by-law acted on at its 1978 annual town meeting was not lawfully adopted. See G. L. c. 231A; G. L. c. 40A, § 5. Article 15 of the warrant for that town meeting proposed to change the zoning of a parcel of land owned by the defendant Codex Corporation from a single residence AA district to a limited industrial district. At an adjourned session on April 19, 1979, the town, which has an open town meeting, voted by more than the required two-thirds vote (see G. L. c. 40A, §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Ellis v. Board of Selectmen of BarnstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gamache v. Town of AcushnetMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Curnin v. Town of EgremontCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Knowles v. Codex Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Nigro v. Conservation Commission of CantonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  5. Mayor of New Bedford v. City CouncilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API