Legal Opinion

Goodson v. . Lehmon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1945PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This ease comes here upon tbe appeal of tbe defendants from a judgment overruling tbe demurrer above set out. Boiled down, tbe demurrer is grounded on these propositions: First, that the complaint is bad for misjoinder of causes of action since, it is contended, tbe plea of mental incompetency of tbe grantor and tbe plea of undue influence on the part of the grantees are inconsistent and may not be joined in the same action under our statute, G. S., 1-123; and second, that the complaint discloses that defendants bought the property in dispute when there was no action pending or effective…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Wessell v. . RathjohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Griffin v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Allen v. . GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Shuffeldt v. JefcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. RivensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Rowland Ex Rel. Messer v. BeauchampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Mayberry v. Home Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Holley v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API