Legal Opinion

Patek & Co. v. Vineberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1962No. Civ. 26218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERNDON, J.—

This appeal is taken by one of two co-defendants from a judgment for plaintiff following a non-jury trial in an action to enforce a written guaranty of an open book account.

The evidence is essentially without conflict. Appellant and his codefendant owned all the stock in a corporation known as Plaza Cleaners, Inc. On September 29, 1959, this corporation was indebted to respondent for supplies in an amount in excess of $7,100. Respondent, through its Southern California manager, advised appellant that it could no longer carry said corporation on this basis and would continue to do…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Igauye v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. In Re the Estate of ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. D. E. Sanford Co. v. Cory Glass Coffee Brewer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oakland Bank of Commerce v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Stiefel v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Sharman v. LongoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API