Patek & Co. v. Vineberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HERNDON, J.—
This appeal is taken by one of two co-defendants from a judgment for plaintiff following a non-jury trial in an action to enforce a written guaranty of an open book account.
The evidence is essentially without conflict. Appellant and his codefendant owned all the stock in a corporation known as Plaza Cleaners, Inc. On September 29, 1959, this corporation was indebted to respondent for supplies in an amount in excess of $7,100. Respondent, through its Southern California manager, advised appellant that it could no longer carry said corporation on this basis and would continue to do…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Igauye v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re the Estate of ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- D. E. Sanford Co. v. Cory Glass Coffee Brewer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Oakland Bank of Commerce v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Stiefel v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Sharman v. LongoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967