Legal Opinion

Buchart v. Burger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1888No. 13,178PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Dubois Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee insists that there is no bill of exceptions in the record. On the back of the bill is written : “ Tendered to me for approval and signature, March 15th, 1886.” This is not sufficient. The statute in express terms requires that “the date of the presentation shall be stated in the bill of exceptions.” R. S. 1881, section 629. It has been expressly decided that a statement on the margin or on the back of the bill is not sufficient. Orton v. Tilden, 110 Ind. 131 (139).

Judgment affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Orton v. TillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Shewalter v. BergmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rigler v. RiglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. White v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McCoy v. State ex rel. TrucksIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API