Webster Tractor & Implement Co. v. Roseberry

AYRES, Judge.

Plaintiff, who operates a service department in connection with the sale of tractors and other farm equipment, instituted this action against the defendant to recover $283.07 allegedly due for repairs to a farm tractor theretofore sold by plaintiff to defendant. Defendant avers that on May 9, 1953, he employed plaintiff to install in his tractor a complete rear end assembly, for which he paid $89.60; that said repairs were not done in a workmanlike manner, but were so defective or so improperly done that said tractor would not operate successfully notwithstanding three other…