Legal Opinion
Cantwell v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Actions to recover salaries.
1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.
These two actions, which were tried together before the court with a jury, were brought, in each case,- to recover the salary claimed to be due to the plaintiff - as matron of the Kings county jail for the period from the 1st day of January, 1908, to the 1st day of January, 1910. At the close of the evidence, plaintiffs and defendant both moved the court to direct a verdict, there being no conflict in the evidence and no dispute as to the facts, and it being conceded that questions of law only were involved, the decision of which would determine the rights of the parties. The facts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goebel v. . WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Fitzsimmons v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Smith v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Steinson v. . Bd. of Education of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Higgins v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cantwell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Cantwell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Carew v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Haley v. Village of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Haley v. Village of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913