Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Schultz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered August 18, 1999, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to vacate his default and to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating the plaintiff’s default and restoring the action to the calendar (see, Matter of Ping Lee v City of New York, 233 AD2d 510). The plaintiff proffered a sufficient excuse for his unintentional default under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Putney v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Lee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API