Royal v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
This is a petition to review Royal v. State, 452 So.2d 1098 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal held that petitioners, who employed force while fleeing a retail store after committing a theft, were properly convicted of robbery. We find conflict with Montsdoca v. State, 84 Fla. 82, 93 So. 157 (1922).1 We quash the district court decision and find that, in defining "robbery" in section 812.13, Florida Statutes (1983), the legislature did not alter the common law requirement that "force, violence, assault, or putting in fear" must occur prior to or contemporaneous…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Montsdoca v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Colbey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
- Stufflebean v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Williams v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Mahn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.