Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tompkins v. DeLeon

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 1979No. C-1487Published

1DissentJustice Carrigan

I respectfully dissent.

In interpreting a statute, a court’s primary duty is to discern and give effect to the intent of the legislature in adopting that statute. As Judge Sternberg noted in his well reasoned and sensible court of appeals’ majority opinion, this court has previously recognized that:

“[Wjhere a statute would operate unjustly, or absurd consequences would result from a literal interpretation of terms and words used that would be contrary to its obvious and manifest purposes, the intention of the framers will prevail over such a literal interpretation.” 40 Colo. App. 241, 243, 576…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dolan v. RustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. People v. SilvolaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. People v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Foster v. Englewood Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Martinez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API