Legal Opinion

McGaw v. Hoen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City. (Ambler, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court and in the case of Conowingo Land Company v. McGaw, 124 Md. 643.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

In the case of Conowingo Land Company v. McGaw, 124 Md. 643, we reversed the judgment and awarded a new trial. When that case was about to be reached for retrial the appellee filed a bill in equity against McGaw and the Conowingo Land Company in which he alleged that he was the owner of 400 shares of the capital stock of that company and prayed, amongst other things, that McGaw be required to deliver up the evidences of debt claimed by him which were involved in the case in 124 Maryland; that they be declared to have been invalidly, illegally and fraudulently issued and void; that said McGaw…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conowingo Land Co. v. McGawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Archway Motors, Inc. v. EdelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API