Clippard Instrument Laboratory, Inc. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The taxpayers contend that even though they failed to- file .notices of appeal with the Tax Cotmpig.-*122sioner, their appeals should not have been dismissed because the commissioner received letters from the board notifying him that the taxpayers had filed notices of appeal with the board.
R. C. 5717.02, which provides for appeals from final determinations of the Tax Commissioner to the- Board of Tax Appeals, stated, at the time relevant herein, in part:
“Such appeals shall be taken by the filing of a written notice to that effect with the board and with the commissioner within thirty days after…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by12 opinions
- Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Board of Education v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Huber Heights Circuit Courts, Ltd. v. CarneOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Huber Hts. Circuit Courts, Ltd. v. CarneOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Foster v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.