Legal Opinion

R. M. Tysdal Real Estate, Inc. v. Lewton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1982No. 13384PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This case is a companion case to Brockel v. Lewton, 319 N.W.2d 173 (S.D.1982), but comes to us as a separate appeal concerning the trial court’s award of a five percent commission to Tysdal Real Estate, Inc. (Tysdal). Lewtons do not contest that Tysdal produced a ready, willing and able buyer. See e.g., Richardson v. Afdahl, 313 N.W.2d 457 (S.D.1981). Instead, they argue that if Haley and Haivala did not breach their fiduciary duty, Tysdal should receive a .05% commission.

Admittedly, the printed listing agreement between Tysdal and Lewtons was filled in to provide for a .05%…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Richardson v. AfdahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Brockel v. LewtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brockel v. LewtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API