Legal Opinion
People v. Dorcas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 28, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), rendered July 27, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
*814Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence adduced at the Hinton hearing (see, People v Hinton, 31 NY2d 71, cert denied 410 US 911) was insufficient to support the trial court’s decision to close the courtroom to the general public, including the defendant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. KanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. BadilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GayleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. HargettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. BlakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. FoxworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.