Legal Opinion

Grubnau v. Centennial National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 1924No. Appeal, No. 123PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Grubnau Brothers were depositors in appellant’s bank. Healey, plaintiff’s employee, forged two checks, using his employer’s name: one on this appellant, the Centennial National Bank, for $4,000, the other on the Corn Exchange National Bank for $1,200. Both checks were paid. When the books were balanced and the forgeries discovered, the banks were duly notified. Grubnau Brothers carried insurance with the ¿Etna Casualty & Surety Company in the sum of $5,000 for loss arising from the misconduct of their employees. Claim was made against the Surety Company for loss…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howes v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. National Union Fire Insurance v. Mellon National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Blue Star Navigation Co. v. Emmons Coal Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Stern Mfg. Co. v. Geo. W. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. National Union InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. First Nat. Bank in DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Winkie, Inc. v. Heritage Bank of Whitefish BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Connecticut Savings Bank v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API