Legal Opinion
Grossman v. Schwartz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 13, 1981No. 81 Civ. 0665PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a permanent civil-service attorney in the competitive class in the New York City Law Department, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Corporation Counsel Allen G. Schwartz and the City of New York, alleging that Schwartz’s hiring of over 100 non-civil-service attorneys since 1978 has deprived him (and members of the class of civil-service attorneys he purports to represent) of due process of law and chilled his exercise of First Amendment rights by infringing on his right to association. Defendants move to dismiss…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grossman v. SchwarzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Grossman v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Marino v. New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986