Legal Opinion

Credle-Brown v. Connecticut

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 20, 2007No. 3:04-cv-1167 (WWE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

This action arises from plaintiff Odessa Credle-Brown’s claims that defendants State of Connecticut, Department of Children and Families (“DCF”), Darlene Dunbar, Renee Hoff, Marc Hambrecht, Christine Kaatz, Heather Panciera, Wanda Estrilla and Lynn Patón (collectively, “employee defendants”) 1 violated her civil rights pursuant to Title I and Title II of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § § 12101, ef seq. (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and state common law in that she was discriminated…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yerdon v. PoitrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  2. Horelick v. LamontDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  3. Howell v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
  4. Jiao v. Shang Shang Qian IncDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API