Credle-Brown v. Connecticut
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
This action arises from plaintiff Odessa Credle-Brown’s claims that defendants State of Connecticut, Department of Children and Families (“DCF”), Darlene Dunbar, Renee Hoff, Marc Hambrecht, Christine Kaatz, Heather Panciera, Wanda Estrilla and Lynn Patón (collectively, “employee defendants”) 1 violated her civil rights pursuant to Title I and Title II of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § § 12101, ef seq. (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and state common law in that she was discriminated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yerdon v. PoitrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- Horelick v. LamontDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Howell v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Jiao v. Shang Shang Qian IncDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025