Legal Opinion

Rawlinson v. Shaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1900Published

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by John W. Rawlinson against Solomon B. Shaw upon an award by arbitrators. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case has been here once before. It is reported in 117 Mich. 5 (75 N. W. 138). A reference to the reported case will make it unnecessary to state some things here that would otherwise be necessary.

Upon the trial, testimony was given tending to show that the parties, in compliance with the provisions of the discipline of the church of which they were both members, submitted their differences to a board of arbitrators selected in accordance with the provisions of the discipline. An award was made as stated in 117 Mich. 5. It is claimed by defendant that the terms of this award were complied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Savannah Cotton Exchange v. State ex rel. Warfield & WayneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Rawlinson v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API