Fort Worth & D. S. P. Ry. Co. v. Gilmore
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.
The appellant railway company instituted this suit against V. B. Gilmore, G. L. White, and Whit Robinson, for the purpose of condemning, for right of way purposes, 5.59 acres of land out of a tract of 198 acres belonging to Gilmore, against which land White and Robinson held an indebtedness secured by vendor’s lien.
The preliminary steps incident to the condemnation of the property were duly taken, the award was made by the commissioners, from which the appellee appealed to the county court.
The appellant made the deposit and filed the bond required by the statute, and constructed its roadbed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HannigTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Jester v. SteinerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Tucker v. HamlinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Frank and Shelley Thornton v. Northeast Harris County MUD 1, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- City of Trinity v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Fort Worth & D. S. P. Ry. Co. v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- City of Amarillo v. AtteburyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- County of Nueces v. SalleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.