Legal Opinion

Damico v. Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Electric Railroad

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 5, 1930No. 70PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Boxd, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff in a suit for damages for personal injuries appeals from a judgment for the defendant, entered on a verdict of a jury upon evidence on behalf of both parties and instructions by the court. Twenty-two exceptions were taken to rulings by the court on the admission of evidence, and one to rulings on prayers for instructions. The rulings on admission of evidence have all been examined in the light of the *472arguments, but found to present no reversible error; and as they have involved no questions of general importance, and no retrial will…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. State ex rel. HauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Rail Road v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  3. United Railways & Electric Co. v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  4. Baltimore Traction Co. v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. Callis v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leatherwood Motor Coach Tours Corp. v. NathanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API