Legal Opinion

The People v. Phillip Couser

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2016No. 166-167Published

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 166 The People &c., Respondent, v. Phillip Couser, Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.) ----------------------- No. 167 The People &c., Respondent, v. Phillip Couser, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.) For Each Case: James A. Hobbs, for appellant. Geoffrey Kaeuper, for respondent. ABDUS-SALAAM, J.: In the first of these appeals we must consider whether Penal Law § 70.25 (2) permits consecutive or concurrent sentencing for defendant's convictions.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. MATTER OF SILMON v. TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. LaureanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. RamirezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API