Legal Opinion

Bell v. Dean

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 16, 2010No. 1741 MDA 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

LAZARUS, J.:

Gordon Bell appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of York County granting summary judgment in his negligence action against defendant, William Dean, III. After careful review, we conclude that the Pennsylvania Skier’s Responsibility Act (“the Act”) bars Bell’s recovery for damages for injuries sustained when Dean collided with him while the two skied and snowboarded at a recreational ski area. Accordingly, we affirm.

The learned trial court set forth the relevant facts and procedural history explicitly:

On January 19, 2006, [Bell] was skiing and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Chepkevich v. Hidden Valley Resort, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Freeman v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Little Mountain Community Ass'n v. Southern Columbia Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Barillari v. SKI Shawnee, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Ashmen v. Big Boulder Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Kane, A. & J. v. Atlantic States Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Kisiel, W. v. Wiszynski, Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API