Legal Opinion
People v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: The evidence presented at trial concerning the nature and severity of the victim’s injuries was sufficient to entitle the jury to infer defendant’s intent to kill (People v McDavis, 97 AD2d 302, 303). The testimony of Anthony Liccione, a convicted murderer, was not incredible as a matter of law- (People v Stroman, 83 AD2d 370, 373). The jury had been informed that Liccione was incarcerated for murder and that he had previously testified against an inmate accused of murdering a cook at Attica Prison. The court adequately instructed the jury that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. StromanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. McDavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. MajeerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. AliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. YourdonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. PeoplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. AllahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.