Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Industrial Commission v. Havens

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 26, 1957No. 18261Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Frantz

specially concurring:

What should be the abiding rule for the establishment of a prima facie claim in a workmen’s compensation case where the evidence as to the causal connection between the employment and the death of the employee is wholly circumstantial? The majority opinion contains the answer, but I think we should attempt a more explicit statement of the applicable principles than appears in such opinion. This concurring opinion is an effort at achieving such statement.

Circumstantial evidence is sufficient to make out a prima facie case, and it may be based upon the reasonable inferences…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Industrial Commission v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Herron Lumber Company v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  5. Valente v. Bourne MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API