Industrial Commission v. Havens
Supreme Court of Colorado
1ConcurrenceJustice Frantz
specially concurring:
What should be the abiding rule for the establishment of a prima facie claim in a workmen’s compensation case where the evidence as to the causal connection between the employment and the death of the employee is wholly circumstantial? The majority opinion contains the answer, but I think we should attempt a more explicit statement of the applicable principles than appears in such opinion. This concurring opinion is an effort at achieving such statement.
Circumstantial evidence is sufficient to make out a prima facie case, and it may be based upon the reasonable inferences…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Industrial Commission v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Herron Lumber Company v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
- Valente v. Bourne MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.