Steele v. Hohenadel
Appellate Court of Illinois
Bill in chancery. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richabd S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
Plaintiff in error has assigned errors and defendant in error has assigned cross-errors.
The propositions advanced and argued by counsel for plaintiff in error are: That the decree of June 16, 1906, is erroneous and should be reversed; that the decree of May 14, 1907, is correct; that the order of June 18, 1907, rendered on the petition of defendant in error, is void for want of jurisdiction, and because the right to answer was denied; and that the order committing plaintiff in error to prison is void.
Counsel for plaintiff in error argue that the decree of June 16, 1906, is erroneous and must…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Baier v. SelkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
- Oakes v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Perry v. CarmichaelIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Levi v. KarrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cowdery v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- People ex rel. Swift v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
- Foster v. StaarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909