Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Schmidt v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1980No. 16097Published

1ConcurrenceWilkins, Justice

I concur that this matter should be remanded and the medical aspects referred to a medical panel. Because, however, of conflicting case law in this State interpreting the statutory requirement that to support an award of compensation a worker must be injured “by accident,” I deem it appropriate to enlarge on the analysis of this point found in the main opinion with a view to providing the Industrial Commission with a consistent standard to apply.

The dissenting opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Crockett centers on the necessity of identifying “an accident” which causes injury. As Professor Arthur…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Purity Biscuit Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Residential & Commercial Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API