Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Adams, E., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2019No. 7 WAP 2018PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Donohue

This discretionary appeal requires the Court to consider once again when an interaction between an ordinary citizen and a law enforcement official ripens from a mere encounter, requiring no level of suspicion, to an investigative detention, which must be supported by reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot. We conclude, based on longstanding precedent of this Court and the United States Supreme Court, that the line is crossed when a reasonable person would not feel free to leave, and that a detention effectuated by police in the interest of officer safety is impermissible in the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LuczkiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Com. v. Brame, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Com. v. Anderson, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Com. v. Bathurst, G., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Green, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API