Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 3, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees —.Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case, the opinion on the first appeal in which the facts are stated being reported in 211 Ky. 315, 277 S. W. 272. On the second trial there was a verdict and judgment for appellee for $10,000.00, to reverse which this appeal is prosecuted. Upon the return of the case to the court below it was by stipulation agreed that appellant and appellee were engaged in interstate commerce at the time appellee received the injury complained of in his petition.

For a reversal of the judgment appellant relies on the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. BethelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. TitusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Monroe v. Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. HonakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Heil v. SeidelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API