Legal Opinion

United States v. Mask

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided April 27, 2000No. 99-20260 DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of the defendants, William Dunavant Mask, III and Mask Cotton Company, Inc. (hereinafter collectively the “Masks”), to dismiss on the basis of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel. The United States opposes the motion.

FACTS

On or about April 15, 1994, the Masks signed an agreement and registered to participate as a cotton exporter in the Upland Cotton User Marketing Certificate Program implemented under the Food, Agricultural, Conservation and…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donna W. Sherwood, et al. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026
  2. Jaron Whitney Owens v. Commonwealth’s of Kentucky et al.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
  3. Smith v. State of TennesseeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API