M'Intire v. Hughes
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION of the Court, by
Ch. J. Boyie.
This waS a sujt in chancery, brought to obtain a conveyance of a tract of land. The original bill alleges in substance that Nicholas M’Intire executed an obligation to convey gQQ acres to his son James M’Intire: that the latter sold a Par^ of the tract to the complainant and his brother William Hughes, and executed a conveyance therefor; but that previous thereto, Nicholas, the father, bad died without having conveyed to his son James, and left suo-dry other children coheirs with James ; and that conse-quently the conveyance by the latter did not transfer…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Ford v. EllingwoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
- Buford's Heirs v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1833
- Holland v. HensleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Mahan v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
- Bright's Executors v. BrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.