Legal Opinion

Lafayette v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 2009No. 45S03-0904-CR-182PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Defendant Otho Lafayette was convicted of rape based in part on evidence of a ten-year-old conviction for attempted rape of another woman. Indiana law prohibits the use of evidence of prior crimes "to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith" except in certain circumstances. The exceptional cireumstance advanced by the State-intent-does not apply in this case. Accordingly, we reverse Defendant's conviction.

Background

The facts most favorable to the convictions indicate that in July, 2007, C.E. told the police that Defendant had raped…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  2. Lannan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Wickizer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Malone v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Desmond Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Wenzel Williams v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Perry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Tami L. Duvall v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Terrance L. Richardson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API