Legal Opinion
Bjorgen v. Kinsey
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1992No. Civ. 910426PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Robert W. Kinsey and Robert W. Kinsey, a professional corporation [defendants] appeal from an order denying their motion for reconsideration of the appointment of a receiver and from an order finding them in civil contempt of court. We affirm.
Anita Bjorgen obtained a judgment in excess of $500,000 against the defendants after a jury found the defendants liable for legal malpractice and deceit or collusion. We affirmed that judgment in Bjorgen v. Kinsey, 466 N.W.2d 553 (N.D.1991).
When Bjorgen’s post-judgment collection efforts were unsuccessful, she moved for appointment of a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rodney W. Quinter v. Volkswagen of America, Volkswagen of Atlantic, Inc., Volkswagenwerk, A. G., Byron BlochCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Roe v. Operation RescueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Spilovoy v. SpilovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Thompson v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- BeauLac v. BeauLacNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AustinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hildebrand v. StolzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.