Legal Opinion

Jeremiah 29:11, Inc. v. Seifert

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 30, 2006No. 94,224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Ernest Douglas (Doug) and Leslie R. Seifert appeal the trial court’s denial of their counterclaim for enforcement of *20restrictive covenants in a transfer of property from 1978. The Seiferts argue the restrictive covenants are enforceable against Jeremiah 29:11, Inc., (Jeremiah); the deed was a deed poll or warranty deed and not an indenture; the transaction did not meet the requirements of the statute of frauds; and the transfer in 1978 gave adequate notice to subsequent purchasers of the restrictive covenant. We reverse and remand with instructions.

The facts in this case are for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. Wuester v. FolinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JEREMIAH 29: 11, INC. v. SeifertSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API