Legal Opinion

American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Barfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1950No. 32981PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts): The general and special demurrers insisted upon by counsel for the defendant relate to the sufficiency of the allegation that, “Plain tiff suffered the loss of said automobile in Boston, Massachusetts on said date as result of a theft committed by one George F. Berry.” The special demurrers seek to obtain further information as to how Berry obtained possession of the car, whether demand has been made upon him, and for what purpose the plaintiff delivered possession to him. These demurrers, insofar as they call for this information, are an attempt to make…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Carlyle v. GoetteeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Great American Insurance Company v. GusmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Lanier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Van Keuren v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Interstate Life & Accident Insurance v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. ROYAL INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. The Hanover Fire Insurance Company of New York v. George D. Argo, D/B/A Ruth's ShopCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  4. Livaditis v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Reserve Life Insurance v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API