Legal Opinion

Hansen v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 31, 1939No. 4584; Seizure No. 1508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is an application for review of the decision of the trial judge (Reap. Dec. 4459) in sustaining a motion by defendant-to dismiss an appeal for a reappraisement on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the case because the plaintiff did not comply with all the provisions of the act of 1930 relating to the entry of the merchandise,

The facts of the case are accurately set forth in the decision below as follows:

From the record it appears that while the steamship General Lee was at Shanghai, China, a Chinese peddler intrusted to the ship’s barber a particular suit case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. LeggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  3. Downing v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. Cargo of SugarDistrict Court, D. California · 1874
  5. Twenty-Eight Cases of WineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1867

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API