Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Titterington

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 9, 2004No. 03-5829PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, J.,- delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOGGS, C.J., joined. NELSON, J. (p. 460), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment and in the opinion of. the court.

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

As this case comes to the court, all agree that a federal indictment need not specifically state that the charged offenses occurred within the pertinent statute-of-limitations period; it suffices that the indictment alleges facts establishing that the offense occurred within the limitations period. What happens, however, when the Government obtains permission to toll the limitations…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ricky Wayne Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Daryl LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Mark Ciavarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Harper v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Richard ScruggsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API