Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States Enrichment Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 3, 2015No. 13-365CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Contracts Dispute Act; Presenting Claim to Contracting Officer; Final Indirect Rates; Provisional Rates; Department of Energy

OPINION ON PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is the partial motion to dismiss of defendant United States on behalf of the Department of Energy (“DOE” or “government”) pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The government asks this court to dismiss Counts II, IV, and VI of the amended complaint filed by plaintiff, United…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Bowhead Enterprise, Science and Technology, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  3. Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Citizant, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. Otis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API