FIRST NAT. BANK OF JERMYN v. Bahara
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentCappy, Justice
I must respectfully dissent to the per curiam decision of the Majority to affirm the Superior Court. I dissent because I believe that the law of this Commonwealth instructs that the confessions of judgment in this case must be stricken. Moreover, I find that the decision of the Superior Court is fatally inconsistent and therefore should not be affirmed.
Appellants have appealed-an order of the Superior Court affirming two judgments against Appellants and affirming in part and reversing in part a third judgment against Appellants.1 The judgments arose out of various financing transactions…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scott Factors, Inc. v. HartleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- First Seneca Bank & Trust Co. v. Laurel Mountain Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Haggerty v. FetnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.