Legal Opinion · Dissent

FIRST NAT. BANK OF JERMYN v. Bahara

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1994No. Appeal 86 Middle District Appeal Docket 1993; Appeal 87 Middle District Appeal Docket 1993; Appeal 88 Middle District Appeal Docket 1993Published

1DissentCappy, Justice

I must respectfully dissent to the per curiam decision of the Majority to affirm the Superior Court. I dissent because I believe that the law of this Commonwealth instructs that the confessions of judgment in this case must be stricken. Moreover, I find that the decision of the Superior Court is fatally inconsistent and therefore should not be affirmed.

Appellants have appealed-an order of the Superior Court affirming two judgments against Appellants and affirming in part and reversing in part a third judgment against Appellants.1 The judgments arose out of various financing transactions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott Factors, Inc. v. HartleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. First Seneca Bank & Trust Co. v. Laurel Mountain Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Haggerty v. FetnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API