Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1983Published

1Dissent

Denman, J.,

dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss indictment, in the following memorandum: I cannot agree with the majority that the failure of the District Attorney to object when the case was placed on the Trial Calendar is the equivalent of a statement of readiness by the People. In my view the rule of People v Brothers (50 NY2d 413) and People v Hamilton (46 NY2d 932) requires the People to make an affirmative showing on the record that they are ready to proceed to trial within the statutory period. (See People v Giordano, 56 NY2d 524, 525; see, also, People v Santiago, 96 AD2d 720.)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. HamiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. GiordanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API