Legal Opinion

California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 1947No. Nos. 11488, 11489PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner is a so-called California cooperative marketing association organized under the California Agricultural Code, hereinafter called the cooperative. The members of the cooperative are thirty producers of ■ raw sugar in the Hawaiian Islands, who transferred title of their sugar to the cooperative for processing and sale under a contract hereafter considered. The contract was made long before the enactment of the processing tax here considered and the case presents no question of tax avoidance.

The cooperative seeks a review of decisions of the Tax Court granting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Bogardus v. Santa Ana Walnut Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Co. v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. LindeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. California and Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corporation, Limited v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Linde v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. Sheldon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API