California & Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner is a so-called California cooperative marketing association organized under the California Agricultural Code, hereinafter called the cooperative. The members of the cooperative are thirty producers of ■ raw sugar in the Hawaiian Islands, who transferred title of their sugar to the cooperative for processing and sale under a contract hereafter considered. The contract was made long before the enactment of the processing tax here considered and the case presents no question of tax avoidance.
The cooperative seeks a review of decisions of the Tax Court granting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Eggert v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bogardus v. Santa Ana Walnut Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farmers Cooperative Co. v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. LindeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- California and Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corporation, Limited v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Linde v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Sheldon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.