Legal Opinion

Clements v. Odorless Excavating Apparatus Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1884No. 136PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatohford

This is a suit in equity, brought for the infringement of reissued letters patent' No. 6,962, granted to Lewis R.-.Keizer, February 29th,"1816,.for an “improvement in apparatus for cleaning privies,” the.original patent, No. 115,565, having been granted, June 6tli, 1871, to Henry C. Bull and Joseph M. Lowenstein, on tbe invention of said Bull, and tbe application for tbe reissue baying been filed. January lltb, 1876. Tbe specification says:

“ My invention consists, mainly, in a sink-cleaning apparatus,' consisting of an-air-pump, a deodorizer’, and suitable tubular connections, in combination…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. James v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. National Nut Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. American Automotoneer Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  5. Electric Gas-Lighting Co. v. Boston Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API