State v. Barrett
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Michael Donlan, Judge. James Barrett was convicted of burglary, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying Mm a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
James Barrett was convicted of burglary and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The specifications of error relate to the admission of evidence and the alleged misconduct of the prosecuting officers.
1. Complaint is made of certain questions asked the defendant and his witnesses on cross-examination. It would not serve any useful purpose to treat these specifications in detail. The evidence sought to be elicited by the questions to which the objections-[1] were made was well within the rule of cross-examination as defined in State v. Howard, 30 Mont.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Frederick v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- State v. TruemanMontana Supreme Court · 1906
- State v. RodgersMontana Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BiggsMontana Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. VanMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Rairden v. HedrickMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1936