Legal Opinion

Truesdale v. CMC Realty Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 20, 1987No. 87 C 5844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Sandra (“Sandra”) and Steve (“Steve”) Truesdale (collectively “Truesdales”) have sued CMC Realty Company (“CMC”) and a group of what this opinion will term “Federal Defendants.” 1 Truesdales seek damages for personal injuries sustained by Sandra and the loss of consortium suffered by Steve, with both claims stemming from Sandra’s July 2, 1985 slip and fall in a HUD-repossessed apartment building. 2 All Federal Defendants have moved for dismissal of this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated in this memorandum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Sims v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Antonio Ramos Perez v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
  2. Schneider v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1990
  3. Conner ex rel. Conner v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1997
  4. Duncan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API