Guardianship of Degnan
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco appointing a guardian of an alleged incompetent person. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of Bridget Degnan, based upon her own affidavit and the supporting affidavits of others, and pressed before the court by respondent’s attorneys. It -may be conceded that the regular, orderly, and courteous method of procedure would have been for the client to give notice to her own attorney of her desire that her appeal should be dismissed, and in the event of his refusal, after notice,, to procure a substitution of attorneys, and through the new attorney bring the matter to the attention of the court. But the fact that the mode here adopted…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hudson v. American Founders Life Ins. Co. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Kullgren v. Navy Gas & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- United States v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Holmes v. JewettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- Cotton-Macauley Co. v. DeshieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.