Myerowitz v. Pathology Laboratory Diagnostics, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FORD ELLIOTT, Judge.
Appellant comes before us challenging the trial court’s granting of appellees’ petition to stay appellant’s petition for a preliminary injunction. The trial court granted the stay because it found that the matters in dispute were subject to arbitration and the court believed that the Uniform Arbitration Act mandated the granting of a stay, citing 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7304(d). We disagree and will remand.
The parties before us are a corporate medical facility and its four shareholder physicians. Pitted against each other are our appellant, the former president and member of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Continental Bank v. Andrew Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Maleski v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Canter's Pharmacy, Inc. v. Elizabeth AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Langston v. National Media Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rosy v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Campbell v. FITZGERALD MOTORS INC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998