Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Mercantile Mutual Insurance

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Curtis, Ch. J.

The affidavit upon which the defendant applies for the examination of the plaintiff fails to comply with the requirements of sections 872 and 886 of the new Code of Civil Procedure. It omits any statement of the residence of the plaintiff or that any inquiry has been made to ascertain it, or that there is any difficulty in learning it. It omits to state whether the plaintiff has appeared by attorney; nor does the name, residence or office address of any attorney on plaintiff’s behalf appear in defendant’s affidavit. There is no proof of any notice to the plaintiff of this order…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Witcher v. Tribune Ass'nThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1891
  2. Dennis v. TebbettsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1899
  3. Fluchtwanger v. DessarNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Witcher v. Tribune Ass'nThe Superior Court of New York City · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API