Legal Opinion

Faust v. Miller

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 11, 1954No. 4 Div. 551PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Statutory action of ejectment. The, plaintiff suffered an adverse judgment below and has appealed.

This was the second suit of the kind, brought by the plaintiff against the defendants for the same land, in which the same title was put in issue by the plea of not guilty, the plaintiff having been cast in the former suit also.- Code 1940, Tit. 7, § 959.

The principal proposition advanced as error to reverse is grounded on the refusal of the trial court to grant the plaintiff a new trial because the jury took with it certain unauthorized papers into the jury room when it retired…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Craig & Co. v. Pierson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Dulaney v. BurnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Clay v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Seaboard Coastline Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Forest Investment Corp. v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Cox v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Evans v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API