Workers' Compensation Board v. Met-Impro Services, Inc.

*530In each of these four related actions pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 26 to enforce a Worker’s Compensation award, the Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of the defendant Robert San Miguel to vacate so much of the judgment in each action as was in favor of the plaintiff, Workers’ Compensation Board, and against him. Certain officers of a corporate employer may, in some circumstances, be held personally liable for Workers’ Compensation benefits that have not *531been paid by a corporate employer (see Workers’ Compensation Law § 26-a [1] [a]). There is no provision in either the…