Zinsser v. Herrman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Aureal from a final order in summary proceedings in favor of the respondent made by the justice of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, borough of Manhattan, first district.
1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, P. J.
This proceeding was instituted for the purpose of dispossessing the appellants from the demised premises on the ground that they held .over and continued in possession thereof, without the permission of the landlord, after a ‘default in the payment of rent which became due on the 1st day" of January, 1898, Upon the return day of the precept the appellants appeared by .counsel and interposed an answer to the petition, which, among other things, denied that said rent had been demanded personally of the tenants, or of either of them, or that any demand whatsoever had been made for the same upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tolman v. HeadingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- People ex rel. Simon v. GrossNew York Supreme Court · 1867
- Wolcott v. SchenkNew York Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schwartz v. Weiss-NewellCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
- Zenila Realty Corp. v. MasterandreaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Alexander Muss & Sons v. RozanyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996
- London Terrace Gardens v. StevensCivil Court of the City of New York · 1993
- Boyd v. MiloneAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.