State v. Hall
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
CHIPMAN, Judge.
The State has petitioned this court on rehearing to reconsider our decision in this case, located at 411 N.E.2d 366, alleging we incorrectly found the jury could have found against the State under the doctrine of respondeat superior where there was no finding against a state employee.
We disagree.
Its contention is since a jury verdict was not returned against the co-defendant, state employee, Officer Bonwell, the jury must have found in favor of Bonwell, and if the jury found in favor of Bonwell, it could not have found against the State by respondeat…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- DDR Computer Service Bureau, Inc. v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lewis v. Joseph Hartley & Sons Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- State v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Riverside Insurance v. PedigoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Royer v. Pryor Ex Rel. PryorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Andrews v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nelson v. MetcalfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982